Originally Posted by Harrison:
I couldn't see any such action holding much water in a trial. The press have freedom of speech, plus last time I looked we lived on the UK, not a communist or Muslim run state.
Freedom of speech to an extent. We still have amongst the strictest libel laws in the world and you can't describe someone/something factually in a derogatory way. It depends if the court would see it as Martin's opinion or Martin stating it as a fact.
[Reply]